{
  "id": 8630353,
  "name": "HORATIO ARRINGTON v. SUNCREST LUMBER COMPANY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Arrington v. Suncrest Lumber Co.",
  "decision_date": "1929-01-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "821",
  "last_page": "821",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "196 N.C. 821"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "110 S. E., 608",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "183 N. C., 48",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655205
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/183/0048-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "108 S. E., 730",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "182 N. C., 205",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655692
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/182/0205-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 161,
    "char_count": 1570,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.492,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20733370941703552
    },
    "sha256": "6c7176c5fcef13c2c30b62080faecc3f000fd2f7ea24948560373a151880a94a",
    "simhash": "1:57bf0452ba928a71",
    "word_count": 265
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:28:30.620798+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HORATIO ARRINGTON v. SUNCREST LUMBER COMPANY et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR CuriaM.\nTbe right of tbe plaintiff to recover for injuries sustained, under circumstances such as those disclosed by tbe present record, is fully discussed in Cook v. Mfg. Co., 182 N. C., 205, 108 S. E., 730, and 183 N. C., 48, 110 S. E., 608.\nTbe case was properly submitted to tbe jury, and we have found no error on tbe record, save a discrepancy between tbe verdiet and tbe judgment as to tbe answer of tbe second issue, but wbicb is not deemed fatal to tbe validity of tbe trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR CuriaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Morgan & Ward and M. G. Stamey for plaintiff.",
      "Hollins & Smothers for defmdkmts."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HORATIO ARRINGTON v. SUNCREST LUMBER COMPANY et al.\n(Filed 9 January, 1929.)\nAppeal by defendants from Harwood, Special Judge, at September Term, 1928, of Haywood.\nCivil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury sustained by plaintiff while working as a \u201ctong-booker\u201d at a steam-loader operated by tbe defendant company, by wbicb logs were lifted from a pile called tbe \u201cjack pot\u201d and placed on railroad cars for. shipment.\nTbe evidence of tbe plaintiff is to tbe effect that tbe engineer in charge of tbe skidder disobeyed tbe signal given by plaintiff, and thus caused tbe log, being lifted, to move in an opposite direction from that expected or anticipated, and caught tbe plaintiff between two cars, breaking bis leg and otherwise injuring and bruising him.\nTbe usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages were submitted to tbe jury and answered in favor of tbe plaintiff. From the judgment rendered thereon, tbe defendants appeal, assigning errors.\nMorgan & Ward and M. G. Stamey for plaintiff.\nHollins & Smothers for defmdkmts."
  },
  "file_name": "0821-01",
  "first_page_order": 901,
  "last_page_order": 901
}