{
  "id": 8630559,
  "name": "BEN E. EASON v. CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eason v. Carolina Power & Light Co.",
  "decision_date": "1929-03-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "825",
  "last_page": "825",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "196 N.C. 825"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 75,
    "char_count": 765,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.476,
    "sha256": "ee1b1c323991886fc920ee8adc70f5fed3ad16a73593889619fb6557efba4757",
    "simhash": "1:da1272cc234efb60",
    "word_count": 122
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:28:30.620798+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BEN E. EASON v. CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for personal injury. The defendant demurred to the complaint and the demurrer was sustained at the February Term, 1928. Thereafter plaintiff filed an amended complaint and the defendant again demurred and the demurrer was sustained at the October Term, 1928. We are of opinion that the complaint fails to disclo.se allegations which are sufficient in law to constitute a valid cause of action against the defendant. The judgment sustaining the demurrer is therefore\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. W. Keel and G. G. Pierce for plaintiff.",
      "Spi'uill & Spruill for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BEN E. EASON v. CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY.\n(Filed 6 March, 1929.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Barnhill, J., at October Term, 1928, of Nash.\nAffirmed.\nJ. W. Keel and G. G. Pierce for plaintiff.\nSpi'uill & Spruill for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0825-01",
  "first_page_order": 905,
  "last_page_order": 905
}