{
  "id": 8631619,
  "name": "AMANDA PAYLOR, Administratrix, v. B. S. WILLIAMS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Paylor v. Williams",
  "decision_date": "1929-04-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "773",
  "last_page": "773",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 N.C. 773"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1068,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "sha256": "4caa35efefe64340ac69c133ff19b7cd90e372d49c64be1d52c3277b55cf93c4",
    "simhash": "1:171b08fea715e9dc",
    "word_count": 178
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:27:44.780576+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "AMANDA PAYLOR, Administratrix, v. B. S. WILLIAMS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nA careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that no error was committed on the trial of the cause. The evidence was amply sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and we have discovered no ruling or action of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Brcmley & Gantt and Gattis & Gattis for plaintiff.",
      "Fuller, Beade & Fuller, J. A. Giles and B. T. Giles for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "AMANDA PAYLOR, Administratrix, v. B. S. WILLIAMS.\n(Filed 3 April, 1929.)\nAppeal by defendant from Devin, J., at October Term, 1928, of ORANGE.\nCivil action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff\u2019s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of the defendant in running him down and striking him with a high-powered automobile.\nThe usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the plaintiff.\nFrom the judgment entered on the verdict the defendant apjteals, assigning errors.\nBrcmley & Gantt and Gattis & Gattis for plaintiff.\nFuller, Beade & Fuller, J. A. Giles and B. T. Giles for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0773-01",
  "first_page_order": 837,
  "last_page_order": 837
}