{
  "id": 8631697,
  "name": "AMERICAN RADIATOR COMPANY v. DIXIE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "American Radiator Co. v. Dixie Fire Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1929-04-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "776",
  "last_page": "777",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 N.C. 776"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 557,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.508,
    "sha256": "d9c89b0af050278cf55861a136bf9c3a638ec6106e8fec1e15b26d812b293f8e",
    "simhash": "1:321f50ddf32de96a",
    "word_count": 90
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:27:44.780576+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "AMERICAN RADIATOR COMPANY v. DIXIE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe questions involved in this case are the same as those in Tomlinson Company, Inc., v. Fire Insurance Company, Inc., post, 777, and the principles applicable here are the same as those controlling in that case. The amount found for the plaintiff was admitted by the defendant to be due.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Shaping & Hampton for plaintiff.",
      "Brooks, Parker, Smith & Wharton for defendant. ."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "AMERICAN RADIATOR COMPANY v. DIXIE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.\n(Filed 17 April, 1929.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Shaw, J., at August Term, 1928, of Guil-ford.\nNo error.\nShaping & Hampton for plaintiff.\nBrooks, Parker, Smith & Wharton for defendant. ."
  },
  "file_name": "0776-02",
  "first_page_order": 840,
  "last_page_order": 841
}