{
  "id": 8631804,
  "name": "BERRY JACKSON v. J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jackson v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.",
  "decision_date": "1929-05-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "781",
  "last_page": "782",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 N.C. 781"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "75 S. E., 860",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "160 N. C., 93",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11270596
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/160/0093-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "93 S. E., 783",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "174 N. C., 263",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11253425
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/174/0263-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1201,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.483,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20734973351728228
    },
    "sha256": "ebbe040b51ebceb1c2faa2eda211dda9b1881410cdbdf50632bc0f83703f8167",
    "simhash": "1:663f2440a4b90545",
    "word_count": 211
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:27:44.780576+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BERRY JACKSON v. J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peb CueiaM.\nThe case presents no new question of law. It is not different in principle from Cherry v. R. R., 174 N. C., 263, 93 S. E., 783, or Pigford v. R. R., 160 N. C., 93, 75 S. E., 860. On authority of these cases the judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peb CueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G. T. Carswell and Joe W. Bruin for plaintiff.",
      "J. Laurence J ones for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BERRY JACKSON v. J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.\n(Filed 8 May, 1929.)\nAppeal by defendant from Sink, Special Judge, at February Special Term, 1929, of MeckleNbueg.\nCivil action by plaintiff, employee of the defendant, to recover damages for personal injury, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant\u2019s foreman, in directing and requiring plaintiff, while engaged in construction work in the city of Charlotte, to carry a crooked piece of steel, 10 or 15 feet long, weighing three or four hundred pounds, across a ditch four feet wide and about four feet deep, without any assistance, which caused plaintiff to fall, as he jumped the ditch, and resulted in serious injury to one of his legs.\nUpon denial of liability and issues joined, there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nG. T. Carswell and Joe W. Bruin for plaintiff.\nJ. Laurence J ones for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0781-01",
  "first_page_order": 845,
  "last_page_order": 846
}
