{
  "id": 8632028,
  "name": "In the Matter of the WILL OF M. IDA GULLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re the Will of Gulley",
  "decision_date": "1929-09-25",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "789",
  "last_page": "790",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 N.C. 789"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1657,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.457,
    "sha256": "75b1c1b22e9f5c03a762ec5402300d4bc1b06cf842bcddb6741a878cb14e6663",
    "simhash": "1:b02db9aa2d3de749",
    "word_count": 280
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:27:44.780576+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In the Matter of the WILL OF M. IDA GULLEY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nAn examination of the record in this appeal does not disclose prejudicial error in any decision by the court below in a matter of law or legal inference for which a new trial should be ordered by this Court.\nThe evidence pertinent to the questions involved in the determinative issues was submitted to the jury under instructions which are in accord with authoritative decisions of this Court. This evidence, consisting largely of the diverse opinions of witnesses, as is usual in proceedings of this nature, was conflicting. The jury having answered the issues contrary to the contentions of the propounders, the judgment in accordance with the verdict must be affirmed. We find\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Dickinson & Freeman for propounders.",
      "Kenneth G. Boydll and J. Faison Thomson for cmeators."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In the Matter of the WILL OF M. IDA GULLEY.\n(Filed 25 September, 1929.)\nAppeal by propounders from Grady, J., at April Term, 1929, of Wayne.\nNo error.\nProceedings upon a caveat to the probate in common form of a paper-writing as the last will and testament of Mrs. M. Ida Gulley.\nThe caveator alleged that the paper-writing propounded as the last will and testament of Mrs. M. Ida Gulley is not her will for that (1) the execution thereof was procured by the undue influence of the bene-ficiari.es named therein, and (2) for that at the date of the execution of said paper-writing, Mrs. M. Ida Gulley did not have sufficient mental capacity to make and execute a will.\nThe issues submitted to the jury were answered in accordance with the contentions of the caveator.\nFrom judgment in accordance with the verdict, the propounders ap-. pealed to the Supreme Court.\nDickinson & Freeman for propounders.\nKenneth G. Boydll and J. Faison Thomson for cmeators."
  },
  "file_name": "0789-02",
  "first_page_order": 853,
  "last_page_order": 854
}