{
  "id": 8605925,
  "name": "ALFRED H. COLVARD, GRAHAM COUNTY et al. v. C. M. DICUS and J. P. DICUS, Trading as DICUS BROTHERS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Colvard v. Dicus",
  "decision_date": "1930-01-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "270",
  "last_page": "271",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 N.C. 270"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "197 N. C., 766",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8631591
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/197/0766-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "80 S. E., 1064",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "165 N. C., 78",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8657384
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/165/0078-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 991,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.449,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.36863391241863e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39026116966664853
    },
    "sha256": "ea0e0dffa6e9fe1255f9897b9ed7d155c438272bd2aa1c26996441629b8abfb5",
    "simhash": "1:0d5bee6c3e259e93",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:53:28.956258+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ALFRED H. COLVARD, GRAHAM COUNTY et al. v. C. M. DICUS and J. P. DICUS, Trading as DICUS BROTHERS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nA jury trial was waived and the trial judge found the facts and entered judgment thereon. There was evidence to support the findings of fact, and the facts found support the judgment. In such event the findings of fact and the judgment thereon are conclusive. Eley v. R. R., 165 N. C., 78, 80 S. E., 1064; Holmes Electric Co. v. Carolina Power and Light Co., 197 N. C., 766.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Morphew & Morphew and R. L. Phillips for plaintiff.",
      "T. N. Jenlcins and Alley & Alley for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ALFRED H. COLVARD, GRAHAM COUNTY et al. v. C. M. DICUS and J. P. DICUS, Trading as DICUS BROTHERS.\n(Filed 22 January, 1930.)\nAppeal and Error J c \u2014 Judgment supported by findings of fact supported by evidence is conclusive.\nUpon jury trial being waived under an agreement tbat the judge should find the facts, his judgment thereon is conclusive on appeal when the evidence supports the facts upon which the judgment was entered.\nCivil actioN, before McElroy, J., at Fall Term, 1929, of Geaham.\nMorphew & Morphew and R. L. Phillips for plaintiff.\nT. N. Jenlcins and Alley & Alley for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0270-01",
  "first_page_order": 340,
  "last_page_order": 341
}