{
  "id": 8620096,
  "name": "A. W. STANTON v. SELIGMAN, WILLIAMS & BALL, and F. W. WILLIAMS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stanton v. Seligman",
  "decision_date": "1930-05-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "759",
  "last_page": "760",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 N.C. 759"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 173,
    "char_count": 1936,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.455,
    "sha256": "a264363cdab4df8bf114899a43b66f832c3da02e641da161d36e2fb460d37e03",
    "simhash": "1:0ccd07bdf6d884a8",
    "word_count": 337
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:53:28.956258+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. W. STANTON v. SELIGMAN, WILLIAMS & BALL, and F. W. WILLIAMS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nOn 1 June, 1927, tbe plaintiff sold to D. P. White \u201call tbe pine and gum timber on tbe farm wbicb tbe party of tbe first part now owns in Tyrrell County,\u201d together with \u201call tbe piling, pine and gum timber which is now cut down and standing, measuring twelve inches and up at the base.\u201d The contract further provided that payments were to be made \u201cone-half of sale price on each lot when delivered to barge or tug unless otherwise agreed to until the one thousand dollars is paid.\u201d\nThis timber deed was not recorded and no lien for the unpaid purchase price was reserved upon the timber. White began cutting timber and sold the timber cut to the defendants who paid him the purchase price. Before the timber was moved plaintiff notified the defendants that he had not been paid, and the defendants declined to pay the plaintiff upon the ground that they had already paid White.\nUpon the present state of .the record, we are of the opinion that the judgment of nonsuit was properly entered.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Aydleti & Simpson for plaintiff.",
      "Ehringhaus & Hall for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. W. STANTON v. SELIGMAN, WILLIAMS & BALL, and F. W. WILLIAMS.\n(Filed 28 May, 1930.)\nDeeds and Conveyances F a \u2014 In this case held: grantor in unregistered' timber deed could not hold grantee\u2019s vendee liable for purchase price.\nWhere the grantor in a timber deed does not reserve title to secure the purchase price to be paid at certain intervals,-and the grantee enters and cuts timber under the unregistered deed and sells the severed timber to another, the purchaser of the cut timber from the grantee is not liable to the grantor upon being notified by him after he had paid the purchase price to the grantee that the grantee had not paid the grantor therefor.\nCivil action, before Moore, Special Judge, at October Term, 1929, of Pasquotank:.\nAt tbe conclusion of tbe evidence a motion of nonsuit was sustained and tbe plaintiff excepted and appealed.\nAydleti & Simpson for plaintiff.\nEhringhaus & Hall for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0759-01",
  "first_page_order": 829,
  "last_page_order": 830
}