{
  "id": 8622049,
  "name": "EARL THOMAS, by His Next Friend, E. G. McCULLOUGH, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Thomas ex rel. McCullough v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.",
  "decision_date": "1930-04-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "822",
  "last_page": "823",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 N.C. 822"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "87 S. E., 963",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "171 N. C., 88",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11269178
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/171/0088-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "111 S. E., 782",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "183 N. C., 450",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8656762
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/183/0450-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1041,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.476,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20721787254778173
    },
    "sha256": "36ab6309217ae5e30e9f0ac6abed639c6aca11bf72ad3379af7457ab39b80ce4",
    "simhash": "1:586724e7631fbfe3",
    "word_count": 177
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:53:28.956258+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "EARL THOMAS, by His Next Friend, E. G. McCULLOUGH, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nWe perceive no valid reason for disturbing the judgment of nonsuit. The principles and authorities applicable and pertinent are discussed in Gaither v. Clement, 183 N. C., 450, 111 S. E., 782, and Wright v. Thompson, 171 N. C., 88, 87 S. E., 963.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "O. J. Sikes .a,nd G. Hobart Morton for plaintiff.",
      "1. B. Burleyson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "EARL THOMAS, by His Next Friend, E. G. McCULLOUGH, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY.\n(Filed 23 April, 1930.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Clement, J., at October Term, 1929, of Stanly.\nCivil action by plaintiff, clerk in the defendant\u2019s grocery store, to recover for an injury sustained on 6 April, 1928, while he was cutting a piece of cheese for a customer with a dull, long-bladed and short-handled knife, which slipped and caused him to cut his finger' \u2014 later becoming infected \u2014 said knife having been used by plaintiff for the same purpose for about six months.\nFrom a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.\nO. J. Sikes .a,nd G. Hobart Morton for plaintiff.\n1. B. Burleyson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0822-02",
  "first_page_order": 892,
  "last_page_order": 893
}