{
  "id": 8622291,
  "name": "STATE v. MARGARET GRIEVAS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Grievas",
  "decision_date": "1930-05-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "824",
  "last_page": "824",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 N.C. 824"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 54,
    "char_count": 420,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.434,
    "sha256": "59d6df82350d84ea9c0da57fbe5199a8b77fe1bc87ca18da8d63dc88bea940d0",
    "simhash": "1:fbd3d295737fe10a",
    "word_count": 67
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:53:28.956258+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. MARGARET GRIEVAS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe defendant was charged with a violation of the prohibition law. There was sufficient evidence to be submitted to the jury. An examination of the record and brief discloses\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummiit and Assistant Attorney-General Na,sh for the State.",
      "0. H. Allen for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. MARGARET GRIEVAS.\n(Filed 14 May, 1930.)\nCbiminal action, before Lyon, J., at December Term, 1929, of Lenoir.\nAttorney-General Brummiit and Assistant Attorney-General Na,sh for the State.\n0. H. Allen for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0824-01",
  "first_page_order": 894,
  "last_page_order": 894
}