{
  "id": 8597082,
  "name": "EDWARD P. GILKEY v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gilkey v. City of Asheville",
  "decision_date": "1930-07-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "218",
  "last_page": "219",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 N.C. 218"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1012,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.483,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.35672523764899033
    },
    "sha256": "ee6b55e5ce4648d60ccbfe62c42a5662921d92a8b16b2759a7a40e96d5c15de7",
    "simhash": "1:afae8c1b264a6ef3",
    "word_count": 169
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:48:33.288027+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "ClaeksoN, J., dissents."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "EDWARD P. GILKEY v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, C. J.\nThis is a companion case to Reynolds v. Asheville, ante, 212, and is controlled by what was said in that case, the similarity of the fact situations in the two cases being such as to call for no dis-tinguishment or further discussion. The legal questions involved are the same.\nWe are not unmindful of the apparent equity of appellants\u2019 position, considering the burdens assumed and benefits conferred by the extension \u25a0of the city limits, but this is a matter which the Legislature is presumed to have considered, and the law is as it is written.\nAffirmed.\nClaeksoN, J., dissents.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Alfred S. Barnard for plaintiff.",
      "George Pennell, Charles N. Malone and Charles E. Jones for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "EDWARD P. GILKEY v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE et al.\n(Filed 2 July, 1930.)\n(See Reynolds v. Asheville, ante, 212.)\nAppeal by defendants from Sink, Special Judge, at April Term, 1930, of BuNCOmbe.\nCivil action to restrain the collection of an alleged illegal tax.\nJudgment for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal.\nAlfred S. Barnard for plaintiff.\nGeorge Pennell, Charles N. Malone and Charles E. Jones for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0218-01",
  "first_page_order": 286,
  "last_page_order": 287
}