{
  "id": 8611083,
  "name": "C. L. HARTON v. J. D. ROSS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harton v. Ross",
  "decision_date": "1930-10-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "630",
  "last_page": "631",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 N.C. 630"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1127,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.469,
    "sha256": "2d97c8fc96c1660f62c5554ba487d1e087a9afc1cb365595f0d07e12eb9dd2a2",
    "simhash": "1:185020321a11a692",
    "word_count": 191
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:48:33.288027+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. L. HARTON v. J. D. ROSS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Oueiam.\nThis is an action to recover damages growing out of the collision of cars, alleged to have been negligently caused by the defendant. At the close of the plaintiff\u2019s evidence the- action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit. The cars in which the parties were traveling collided on a concrete bridge coated with ice. The plaintiff was injured and his car was damaged; but the injury and damage seem to have resulted from the condition of the highway and not from actionable negligence on the part of the defendant.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Oueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Coulter & Cooper for plaintiff.",
      "D. Dolph Long for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. L. HARTON v. J. D. ROSS.\n(Filed 22 October, 1930.)\nHighways B i \u2014 Where evidence discloses that anto accident resulted from ice on bridge and not from defendant\u2019s negligence, nonsuit is l>roper.\nWhere in an action for damages resulting from an automobile collision the evidence tends to show that the accident resulted from ice on a highway bridge and not from any negligence of the defendant, defendant\u2019s motion as of nonsuit is properly allowed.\nAppeal by' plaintiff from Harris, J., at May Term, 1930, of AlaMANCe.\nAffirmed.\nCoulter & Cooper for plaintiff.\nD. Dolph Long for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0630-01",
  "first_page_order": 698,
  "last_page_order": 699
}