{
  "id": 8616875,
  "name": "STATE v. ELDRIDGE BENTHAL and GILBERT BRETT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Benthal",
  "decision_date": "1930-09-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "808",
  "last_page": "808",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 N.C. 808"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 67,
    "char_count": 567,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.407,
    "sha256": "d8b724236a93205e964ede4e5b8c8e7cea948cbb8fccb0ff54cf0f3e864c7a8d",
    "simhash": "1:cbf953984849642f",
    "word_count": 89
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:48:33.288027+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ELDRIDGE BENTHAL and GILBERT BRETT."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peb Cueiam.\nTbe defendants were convicted upon an indictment charging them with the larceny of peanuts. From the sentence pronounced they appealed upon several assignments of error. We have considered each of the exceptions! and find no sufficient cause for granting a new trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peb Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "\u00c1ttomey-QeneraL Bnvmmitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.",
      "F. B. Tyler and B. G. B'ames for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ELDRIDGE BENTHAL and GILBERT BRETT.\n(Filed 24 September, 1930.)\nAppeal by defendants from Qrarvmer, J., at July Term, 1930, of Hebtfoed.\nNo error.\n\u00c1ttomey-QeneraL Bnvmmitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.\nF. B. Tyler and B. G. B'ames for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0808-01",
  "first_page_order": 876,
  "last_page_order": 876
}