{
  "id": 8617200,
  "name": "EMMA RATCLIFF v. W. H. DUNCAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ratcliff v. Duncan",
  "decision_date": "1930-10-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "811",
  "last_page": "812",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 N.C. 811"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 61,
    "char_count": 492,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.457,
    "sha256": "77a7aec56f3f9294a6d38d3992897e7632da5659c40b2520840860fc48977d89",
    "simhash": "1:594002f43a2320ca",
    "word_count": 80
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:48:33.288027+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "EMMA RATCLIFF v. W. H. DUNCAN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nNo error baying been made to appear, tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Moody & Sadi for plaintiff.",
      "Edwards & Lealherwood and Alley & Alley for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "EMMA RATCLIFF v. W. H. DUNCAN.\n(Filed 22 October, 1930.)\nAppeal by defendant from Schenck, J., at October Term, 1929, of SwaiN.\nCivil action in ejectment or to recover possession of a tract of land.\nFrom a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff, and judgment thereon, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nMoody & Sadi for plaintiff.\nEdwards & Lealherwood and Alley & Alley for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0811-01",
  "first_page_order": 879,
  "last_page_order": 880
}