{
  "id": 8617520,
  "name": "W. REUBEN RUDD v. R. L. HOLMES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rudd v. Holmes",
  "decision_date": "1930-11-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "813",
  "last_page": "813",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 N.C. 813"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "196 N. C., 640",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 56,
    "char_count": 383,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.44,
    "sha256": "bb0d3ecfb74d0b977c0609cdf0d3e7a28f96dbdd9d3de3bda0d4c9bca3280496",
    "simhash": "1:343a065a1d30a5ba",
    "word_count": 68
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:48:33.288027+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. REUBEN RUDD v. R. L. HOLMES."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:.\nWe have examined the exceptions of the appellant and have discovered no error which entitles him to a new trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "H. B. Stamley for plaintiff.",
      "John W. Hester and T. Glenn Henclerson for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. REUBEN RUDD v. R. L. HOLMES.\n(Filed 12 November, 1930.)\nAppeal by defendant from Schenck, J., at August Term, 1930, of Gttjileord.\nNo error.\nSee 196 N. C., 640.\nH. B. Stamley for plaintiff.\nJohn W. Hester and T. Glenn Henclerson for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0813-01",
  "first_page_order": 881,
  "last_page_order": 881
}