{
  "id": 8618355,
  "name": "W. W. GUY v. C. A. GOULD et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Guy v. Gould",
  "decision_date": "1930-12-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "820",
  "last_page": "820",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 N.C. 820"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "131 S. E., 750",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "191 N. C., 412",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629560
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/191/0412-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "142 S. E., 783",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "195 N. C., 532",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8630584
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/195/0532-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 904,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.44,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20719412598958473
    },
    "sha256": "4e232d6368b6201ed9349169bacda7725667c01b4fbed4270b08043274a1de27",
    "simhash": "1:449273152ff9a93b",
    "word_count": 158
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:48:33.288027+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. W. GUY v. C. A. GOULD et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Oumam.\nA careful perusal of tbe record fails to manifest any error in tbe ruling of tbe trial court. Causey v. Morris, 195 N. C., 532, 142 S. E., 783; Carnegie v. Perkins, 191 N. C., 412, 131 S. E., 750.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Oumam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Winborne & Proctor for plaintiff.",
      "Vonno L. Gudger, Kit chin & Kiichin md J. Scroop Styles for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. W. GUY v. C. A. GOULD et al.\n(Filed 10 December, 1930.)\nAppeal by defendants from Harding, J., at July Term, 1930, of McDowell.\nCivil action instituted in McDowell County, tbe county of plaintiff\u2019s residence, to recover for rent due on land situate in Buncombe County.\nMotion by defendants, after filing answer, to transfer cause to Buncombe County for trial as tbe proper venue for said action, in that, it is alleged, tbe action is to determine some right or interest in real estate, or for tbe recovery of personal property. O. S., 463. Motion overruled. Defendants appeal.\nWinborne & Proctor for plaintiff.\nVonno L. Gudger, Kit chin & Kiichin md J. Scroop Styles for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0820-01",
  "first_page_order": 888,
  "last_page_order": 888
}