{
  "id": 8684815,
  "name": "Moore v. Suttril's Adm'r",
  "name_abbreviation": "Moore v. Suttril's Adm'r",
  "decision_date": "1792-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "22",
  "last_page": "22",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Hayw. 22"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "2 N.C. 22"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 73,
    "char_count": 660,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.334,
    "sha256": "e97ee1032d6d6d1ed628c0624c2708f7d3aa90e7431d13a5619bb3d9d18215e8",
    "simhash": "1:1a2c23cfca0e8158",
    "word_count": 119
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:10:25.463344+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Moore v. Suttril\u2019s Adm\u2019r."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Note. \u2014 Vide Chitt. Plead. 43.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Moore v. Suttril\u2019s Adm\u2019r.\nDoctor Umstead was sued as administrator in right of his wife, a capias issued to Chatham, where he did not live, &c. Objected by Mr. Mhore, a capias ought not, to have issued, but a summons ; and the attachment is irregular, being founded on such a capias; and the suit is improperly brought, it ought to have been against Mrs. Umstead also, for suppose she had died, it would have abated \u2014 if he had died, it would have abated also, as the case is circumstanced : but had it been brought against both, and he had died, it would have survived against her. The Plaintiff being not ready, was nonsuited."
  },
  "file_name": "0022-01",
  "first_page_order": 30,
  "last_page_order": 30
}