{
  "id": 8694103,
  "name": "Duncan M'Rae v. the Administrators of J Moore",
  "name_abbreviation": "M'Rae v. Administrators of Moore",
  "decision_date": "1795-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "209",
  "last_page": "210",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Hayw. 209"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "2 N.C. 209"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "1 Dev. 442",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Dev.",
      "case_ids": [
        8696015
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/12/0442-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1345,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.279,
    "sha256": "4c0124cb6f9b5f1786bb0c62da37ff7f4e630b46704ba1fb58c2d9d1673ea241",
    "simhash": "1:02b90f2b983e4326",
    "word_count": 237
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:10:25.463344+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Duncan M\u2018Rae v. the Administrators of J Moore."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Note \u2014 Vide 1 Saund. 336, note 10, for the form of tin- judgmen in auch case. See also Gregory v. Hooker\u2019s admr. 1 Dev. 442,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Duncan M\u2018Rae v. the Administrators of J Moore.\nWhen \u201c no na,o\u00eds\u201d are picad, toe Plihstiff shall have judgment for the amount of tne assets which h- can show in the hands of the Administrator, anu judgment guando for the batanee of his debt.\nSet off and no assets pleaded. The debt was one hundred and fifty-four pounds two shillings, and Plaintiff produced the inventory, shewing assets to the value of one bundled and twenty-four pounds eighteen shillings and six pence; end the jury gave their verditt accordingly \u2014 whereupon the Plaintiff* had judgment Cor one bund red and twenty-four pounds eighteen shillings and six-pence, to he levied of the goods of the deceased, in the hands of the administrators ; and for the, residue he had judgment to be \u00a1. vied of the assets which should thereafter come to the hands of the administrators to be administered.\nVide S Rep. !34. Stcinb. 392. Leon.fol 67. 1 .find.. 150. The Office of Executors, p. 191, says Plaintiff shall have judgment. f\u00abr ps much as Defendant hath assets to pay, an(] an award that quando assets acciderint in futuro, that then he shall have, judgment fur th>' residue, npon which award a sci. fa. lies to have judgment and execution. Co. Eat. 151, b."
  },
  "file_name": "0209-01",
  "first_page_order": 217,
  "last_page_order": 218
}