{
  "id": 8698839,
  "name": "Parker and Wife v. Phillips",
  "name_abbreviation": "Parker v. Phillips",
  "decision_date": "1796-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "519",
  "last_page": "519",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Hayw. 519"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "2 N.C. 519"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 1125,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.333,
    "sha256": "b545859465771ea723914d03d63008ac277c2d700353f5a8667a4e8e16a9f59f",
    "simhash": "1:39f7563bb03a4cc7",
    "word_count": 195
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:10:25.463344+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Parker and Wife v. Phillips."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Note. \u2014 Vide Farrell v. Perry, and the note thereto, ante 2.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HALIFAX,\nOCTOBER TERM, 1796.\nParker and Wife v. Phillips.\nWhere a father, upon the marriage of his daughter, sends negroes or or other property with her in marriage, it is prima facie, a gift.\nTrover for a negro, which the father of the Plaintiff\u2019s wife (and also of Phillips, who claims under a subsequent gift,) sent with Iter on her marriage, to her husband\u2019s house. About a year afterwards, in occasional conversation, he mentioned to his daughter, that he had not intended ever to take the negro away from her, when he sent her to her husband\u2019s house. There was other cvi-deuce, hut upon this, Stone, Justice, ruled according to the former decisions in \u00a1he cases of Perry & Farrell, Garter & Rutland, and Whitmell v. Moore, decided at Eden-ton, prior to the two others \u2014 where a father, upon \u00a1he marriage of his daughter, sends negroes or other property wiih her upon her marriage, to her husband\u2019s house, thrt it is a gift, unless the contrary he \u00a1troven : which in the present case not Staving been done, there was a verdict and judgment for the Plaintiff."
  },
  "file_name": "0519-02",
  "first_page_order": 525,
  "last_page_order": 525
}