{
  "id": 8698887,
  "name": "Blount v. Fish",
  "name_abbreviation": "Blount v. Fish",
  "decision_date": "1797-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "578",
  "last_page": "578",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Hayw. 578"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "2 N.C. 578"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 59,
    "char_count": 476,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.356,
    "sha256": "3320989d1e2201d5555754c5914c20e0582e9cd405752e41196d550128fc997f",
    "simhash": "1:d5fa3bd0338fb681",
    "word_count": 85
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:10:25.463344+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Blount v. Fish."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Note. \u2014 Fide same point decided in the case of Smith v. Walker\u2019s 32 x\u2019rs. 2 Car. Law Rep. 245.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Blount v. Fish.\nThis was a qui tam action. The Defendant had died pending the action. Et per curiam \u2014 The act continues no suit whirl) before the act was not maintainable against executors ; and as this action before the act, would have abated by the death of the Defendant, and cfould not have been afterwards commenced against his executors, it is abated now. The action abated."
  },
  "file_name": "0578-01",
  "first_page_order": 584,
  "last_page_order": 584
}