{
  "id": 8691410,
  "name": "THE STATE v. ALFRED GOINGS, alias ALFRED TERRY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Goings",
  "decision_date": "1838-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "152",
  "last_page": "154",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "3 Dev. & Bat. 152"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "20 N.C. 152"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 302,
    "char_count": 4784,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.591,
    "sha256": "5fd856048c8a1b45e0795f7ede2439723bff94a0896a2cbaec95d4626d453508",
    "simhash": "1:b65457103e829628",
    "word_count": 862
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:59:24.594429+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE STATE v. ALFRED GOINGS, alias ALFRED TERRY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Daniel, Judge,\nhaving stated the case, proceeded as follows : Our statute (see 1 Rev. Stat. ch. 34, sec. 5) is as follows : \u201c Any person who shall ravish and carnally know any female of the age of ten years or more, by force or against her will, or who shall unlawfully and carnally know and abuse any female. child under the age of ten years, shall be adjudged guilty of felony,, and shall suffer death without benefit of clergy.\u201d That part of our statute which relates to the abuse of a female child, is merely taken from the fourth section of the statute of 18 Eliz. ch. 7. That section of the English statute declares, \u201c That if any person shall unlawfully and carnally know and abuse any woman child, under the age of ten years,\u201d &c. The form of an indictment, good under the English statute, we think, must be good under our act, which is so near a copy of the English statute. We have examined in several books of practice in Crown cases, the precedents of indictments for rape on infant females under the age of Jen years. In the form in Stubb\u2019s Cr. C. 612, and also that in Archb. C. P. 373, she is stated as \u201c cm infant under the age of ten years.\u201d The words \u201c woman child,\u201d are not inserted in any part of the forms given by these authors. The form in 3 Cjhitty\u2019s Grim. Law 816, does contain the very words of the statute, \u201c in and, upon E. P., spinster, a woman child, under the age of ten years,\u201d &.c Mr. Chitty, in a note says, \u201csometimes the words woman child are omitted, but it seems better to follow the words of the statute.\u201d These remarks of his are given to the profession from abundant caution ; \u2014 he' does not pretend, that there ever has been any adjudication demanding the insertion of these words in the indictment. When we read the sentence in the indictment, and arrive at the personal pronoun her, it seems to us, it is sufficiently certain that the person mentioned as abused, is no other than a female. This pronoun \u201c her,\u201d agrees grammatically with its antecedent, Mary M. Cook, in gender, number and person. Secondly, in indictments for offences against the person or\n20 property of individuals in England, no addition to the names \u00b0f those individuals is requisite; 2 Hale, 182; and it has been said, if stated it need not be proved. Rex v. Graham, 2 Leach 547. Rex v. Ogilvie, 2 Car. & P. 230. Archb. Crim. p. 31. The objection that the addition of \u201c spinster,\u201d the name of Mary M. Cook, was omitted in the indictment, has no weight. We have looked through the whole record, and there does not appear to us any thing why judgment should not have'been rendered for the State against prisoner. The judgment rendered by the Superior Court of law for the county of Cumberland in this case, is by (jourt reversed. This opinion will be certified to the said Superior Court of Cumberland county, that judgment of death may be there given for the State against the prisoner according to law.\nments'for persons or fndmdu-\u00b0 dit\u00edon\u00b0to^\" dividuals is requisite,\nPer Curiam. Judgment reversed. '",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Daniel, Judge,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "The Attorney General, for the State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE STATE v. ALFRED GOINGS, alias ALFRED TERRY.\nAn indictment upon our statute (1 Rev. Stat. ch. 34, sec. 5) for abusing and carnally knowing a female child under the age of ten years, which charges the rape to be \u201c in and upon one M. C., an infant under ten years of age, &c.,\u201d \u201c and her, the said M. C., feloniously did unlawfully and carnally know and abuse, &c.,\u201d is sufficient without describing the infant as a \u201cfemale, childnor is the addition of \u201c spinster\u201d to the name of the infant, requisite in such an indictment.\nThe prisoner was put upon his trial at Cumberland on the last circuit before his Honor Judge Nash, upon an indictment which charged that 'he, \u201c on the twenty sixth day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and thirty-eight, with force and arms, in the county of Cumberland aforesaid, in and upon one Mary M. Cook, an infant under the age of ten years, to wit, of the age of seven years,, in the peace of God and the State, then and there being, feloniously did make an assault, and her the said Mary M. 'Cook, then and there feloniously, did unlawfully and carnally know and abuse, against the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State.\u201d The prisoner was found guilty, and his counsel moved in arrest of judgment, because the prisoner was charged in the bill of indictment \u201c with carnally knowing and abusing one Mary M. Cook, an infant under the age of ten years, whereas, the offence should have been charged to have been committed on Mary M. Cook, spinster, an infant &c., or upon Mary M. Cook, a woman child,\u201d &c.\nDec. 1838.\nHis Honor sustained the motion in arrest of the ment, and the solicitor for the State appealed.\nThe Attorney General, for the State."
  },
  "file_name": "0152-01",
  "first_page_order": 282,
  "last_page_order": 284
}