{
  "id": 8616662,
  "name": "I. W. LIPE v. COUNTY OF STANLY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lipe v. County of Stanly",
  "decision_date": "1930-12-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "92",
  "last_page": "92",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "200 N.C. 92"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "199 N. C., 788",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8615941
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/199/0788-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "199 N. C., 667",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8612356
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/199/0667-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "26 S. E., 779",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "120 N. C., 176",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8656818
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/120/0176-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1399,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.452,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20718698271598074
    },
    "sha256": "72ab8cfc8f17d7ccc2348e8b8bf75417b4437fbc119182fa0af983fa9ae931df",
    "simhash": "1:4fa987dc4bd8071a",
    "word_count": 235
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:40:42.579520+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "I. W. LIPE v. COUNTY OF STANLY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Oubiam.\nIt is not clear from tbe record wbetber tbis is a controversy without action, submitted on an agreed statement of facts, or an adversary proceeding in which tbe facts were agreed upon. If tbe former, it must be dismissed for failure to accompany tbe agreed statement of facts with necessary affidavit. Grandy v. Gulley, 120 N. C., 176, 26 S. E., 779. If tbe latter, tbe pleadings are not before us and tbe appeal must be dismissed for failure to sendmp' necessary parts of the record proper. Waters v. Waters, 199 N. C., 667; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788.\nDismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Oubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. L. Mann for plaintiff.",
      "W. B. Bogle for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "I. W. LIPE v. COUNTY OF STANLY.\n(Filed 19 December, 1930.)\nControversy without Action A h: Appeal and Error E a \u2014 Affidavit must be filed in submission of controversy: Record must contain necessary parts.\nA case submitted on agreed statement of facts must be accompanied by necessary affidavit, and if an adversary proceeding tbe record proper must contain necessary parts, otherwise the appeal will be dismissed.\nAppeal by defendant from Johnson. Special Judge, at July Term, 1930, of StaNly.\nProceeding to determine tbe liability of tbe defendant under C. S., 8035, \u201cfor costs and attorney\u2019s fees\u201d where unidentified and undiseov-erable lands are sold for taxes.\nFrom a judgment for tbe plaintiff, rendered on an agreed statement of facts, tbe defendant appeals.\nW. L. Mann for plaintiff.\nW. B. Bogle for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0092-01",
  "first_page_order": 160,
  "last_page_order": 160
}