{
  "id": 8626448,
  "name": "ORANGE COUNTY v. DAISY JENKINS et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Orange County v. Jenkins",
  "decision_date": "1931-01-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "798",
  "last_page": "798",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "200 N.C. 798"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 56,
    "char_count": 405,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.413,
    "sha256": "d71cab30875f8faddf28b5c1353911255fd984f1e915b5e8e301b524902b1b34",
    "simhash": "1:3b796e338ee4883a",
    "word_count": 72
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:40:42.579520+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ORANGE COUNTY v. DAISY JENKINS et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Oubiam.\nIn view of tbe agreed facts and tbe admissions set out in tbe judgment, we are of opinion that tbe decision in Orange County v. Andrew Jenhins et ff}., ante, 202, is controlling in tbis ease. Judgment\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Oubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. T. Giles for plaintiff.",
      "J. B. Carawan for Hinshaw, respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ORANGE COUNTY v. DAISY JENKINS et al.\n(Filed 27 January, 1931.)\nAppeal by O. P. Hinsbaw from Grady, J. From ObaNge.\nB. T. Giles for plaintiff.\nJ. B. Carawan for Hinshaw, respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0798-01",
  "first_page_order": 866,
  "last_page_order": 866
}