{
  "id": 8626548,
  "name": "WILLIE LANGLEY v. HOME SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Langley v. Home Security Life Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1931-03-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "801",
  "last_page": "801",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "200 N.C. 801"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 65,
    "char_count": 544,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.427,
    "sha256": "a196e2d284d80efed9067f8caa2333b00612abd71d5aee36acb778e78a156d32",
    "simhash": "1:3065140319319adf",
    "word_count": 87
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:40:42.579520+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIE LANGLEY v. HOME SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per CuriaM.\nIt appears from plaintiff\u2019s own testimony that tbe policy in suit lapsed from tbe nonpayment of premiums long before tbe institution of tbe present action. Tbe judgment of nonsuit is correct.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per CuriaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "P. B. Hines for plaintiff.",
      "No counsel appearing for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIE LANGLEY v. HOME SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.\n(Filed 4 March, 1931.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from DeVin, J., at January Term, 1931, of Pitt. Civil action to recover on a contract of insurance.\nFrom a judgment of nonsuit tbe plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.\nP. B. Hines for plaintiff.\nNo counsel appearing for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0801-01",
  "first_page_order": 869,
  "last_page_order": 869
}