{
  "id": 8627164,
  "name": "H. H. MOORE, Employee, Deceased, MRS. MAUDE MOORE, v. PINE HALL BRICK AND PIPE COMPANY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Moore v. Pine Hall Brick & Pipe Co.",
  "decision_date": "1931-11-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "617",
  "last_page": "617",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 N.C. 617"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 760,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.451,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.35494231516972613
    },
    "sha256": "05a5083833d86da47f409b9eb8821199fd199ac80d41f8f62067b737e5f2a42e",
    "simhash": "1:f198486d1b938ce9",
    "word_count": 127
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:25:15.863450+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "H. H. MOORE, Employee, Deceased, MRS. MAUDE MOORE, v. PINE HALL BRICK AND PIPE COMPANY et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Adams, J.\nIn Hollowell v. North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development, ante, 616, we held that an appeal from the award of one member of the Industrial Commission cannot be taken directly to the Superior Court but must first be .reviewed by the full Commission. The cause is remanded with leave to the appellant to appeal to the full Commission as provided by law.\nError and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Adams, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Peyton B. Abbott and Hmtings & Booe for appellant.",
      "Ralph V. Kidd for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "H. H. MOORE, Employee, Deceased, MRS. MAUDE MOORE, v. PINE HALL BRICK AND PIPE COMPANY et al.\n(Filed 10 November, 1931.)\n(Por digest see Sollowell v. Department of Conservation, ante, 616.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Clement, J., at April Term, 1931, of Eoesttbc.\nError and remanded.\nPeyton B. Abbott and Hmtings & Booe for appellant.\nRalph V. Kidd for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0617-01",
  "first_page_order": 691,
  "last_page_order": 691
}