{
  "id": 8628498,
  "name": "ERVIN F. ASHE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, JOE DAUGHERTY and W. H. MICHAEL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ashe v. Southern Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1931-05-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "823",
  "last_page": "823",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 N.C. 823"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 839,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.475,
    "sha256": "05d4dbb4092866b367e1307fb78a670e68bf9c70c9b92a3f7ce80f912dbdf99a",
    "simhash": "1:9b374124fd702525",
    "word_count": 141
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:25:15.863450+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ERVIN F. ASHE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, JOE DAUGHERTY and W. H. MICHAEL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee OukiaM.\nTbe plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants in the operation of a train of the Southern Eailway Company. At the close of the plaintiff\u2019s evidence the action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit. After careful examination of the evidence and of the briefs filed on behalf of plaintiff and defendant, we are convinced that the plaintiff is not entitled to the recovery of damages. The judgment dismissing the action is therefore\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee OukiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Doyle D. Alley, A. Hall J ohnston and Alley & Alley for plaintiff.",
      "G. K. Hughes and J ones & Ward for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ERVIN F. ASHE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, JOE DAUGHERTY and W. H. MICHAEL.\n(Filed 27 May, 1931.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from MacBae, Special Judge, at October Term, 1930, of JacxsoN.\nAffirmed.\nDoyle D. Alley, A. Hall J ohnston and Alley & Alley for plaintiff.\nG. K. Hughes and J ones & Ward for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0823-01",
  "first_page_order": 897,
  "last_page_order": 897
}