{
  "id": 8628531,
  "name": "STATE v. DONALD ARNOLD and HENRY ARNOLD",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Arnold",
  "decision_date": "1931-09-30",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "824",
  "last_page": "825",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 N.C. 824"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1099,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.431,
    "sha256": "3a4c0b78bcf88f9175c44755a3819a03a13a65268d07937cc980da9cba1cd657",
    "simhash": "1:3c199fc4eb34a1ad",
    "word_count": 178
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:25:15.863450+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. DONALD ARNOLD and HENRY ARNOLD."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nOn the hearing the trial narrowed itself largely to issues of fact, which the jury resolved in favor of the State and against the contentions of the defendants. A different verdict might have been returned, but it was not.\nTbe record discloses no exceptive assignment of error upon which this Court, in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction, could award the defendants a new trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummiit and Assistant Attorney-General Beawell for the State.",
      "Ernest M. Green and D. L. Ward, Jr., for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. DONALD ARNOLD and HENRY ARNOLD.\n(Filed 30 September, 1931.)\nAppeal by defendants from Devin, J., at June Term, 1931, of CeAVBN.\nCriminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendants, and two others, with the murder of one Claude Coward.\nYerdict: Guilty of murder in the second degree as to Donald Arnold; and guilty of manslaughter as to Henry Arnold.\nJudgment: Imprisonment in the State\u2019s prison, 5 years for Donald Arnold and 2 years for Henry Arnold.\nDefendants appeal, assigning errors.\nAttorney-General Brummiit and Assistant Attorney-General Beawell for the State.\nErnest M. Green and D. L. Ward, Jr., for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0824-01",
  "first_page_order": 898,
  "last_page_order": 899
}