{
  "id": 8628898,
  "name": "CHARLIE BELL, Administrator of ALONZO BELL, v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, N. J. WHITE, and HORTON MOTOR LINES, Incorporated",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.",
  "decision_date": "1931-11-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "839",
  "last_page": "839",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 N.C. 839"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "191 N. C., 366",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629209
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/191/0366-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "186 N. C., 111",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652892
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/186/0111-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 1180,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.452,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.061447019797991e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3192529757526404
    },
    "sha256": "71eae7d68fe9e19950e1f62c8c16c74b34ace02e97cd075a2ce8c2231af1c46c",
    "simhash": "1:a41225e597426ddc",
    "word_count": 195
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:25:15.863450+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CHARLIE BELL, Administrator of ALONZO BELL, v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, N. J. WHITE, and HORTON MOTOR LINES, Incorporated."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for the wrongful death of his intestate Alonzo Bell. He moved for judgment by default and inquiry against the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company for want of an answer. This defendant resisted the plaintiff\u2019s motion and moved for an extension of time for filing the answer. The clerk denied the defendant\u2019s motion for want of power to extend the time, gave judgment by default and inquiry, and retained the case upon the docket of the Superior Court for the assessment of damages. The defendant excepted and appealed. Judge War lick found certain facts and in the exercise of his discretion granted the defendant\u2019s motion for the extension of time at which to file its answer.\nThe judgment is affirmed upon the authority of McNair v. Yarboro, 186 N. C., 111, and Howard v. Hinson, 191 N. C., 366.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Walser'& Walser for appellant.",
      "Raper & Raper for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CHARLIE BELL, Administrator of ALONZO BELL, v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, N. J. WHITE, and HORTON MOTOR LINES, Incorporated.\n(Filed 10 November, 1931.)\nAppeal -by plaintiff from Warticle, J., at September Term, 1931, of DavidsoN.\nAffirmed.\nWalser'& Walser for appellant.\nRaper & Raper for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0839-01",
  "first_page_order": 913,
  "last_page_order": 913
}