{
  "id": 8628910,
  "name": "BERTHA NEBEL v. WILLIAM NEBEL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nebel v. Nebel",
  "decision_date": "1931-11-25",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "840",
  "last_page": "840",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 N.C. 840"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "200 N. C., 803",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626604
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/200/0803-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "200 N. C., 88",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8616427,
        8616364
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/200/0088-02",
        "/nc/200/0088-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "196 N. C., 824",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8630524,
        8630543
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/196/0824-01",
        "/nc/196/0824-02"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "196 N. C., 823",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8630505,
        8630483
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/196/0823-02",
        "/nc/196/0823-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1086,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.462,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20730629469131212
    },
    "sha256": "a1fc9423d8e317b57388eef7def667933c75bb00717f72064174bc6f8853684d",
    "simhash": "1:d33a979126022782",
    "word_count": 188
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:25:15.863450+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BERTHA NEBEL v. WILLIAM NEBEL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe Court being evenly divided in opinion, one of the members, the Ghief Justice, not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this action, without becoming a precedent. Gooch v. Western Union Tel. Co., 196 N. C., 823; Tarboro v. Johnson, 196 N. C., 824; Parsons v. Board of Education, 200 N. C., 88; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N. C., 803.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. L. Kirkpatrick and H. L. Taylor for plaintiff.",
      "E. A. Ililker and B. G. Watkins for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BERTHA NEBEL v. WILLIAM NEBEL.\n(Filed 25 November, 1931.)\nAppeal and Error J d \u2014 Where Supreme Court is divided the judgment of the lower court will he affirmed.\nUpon an even division of opinion of the Supreme Court on appeal, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.\nAppeal by defendant from Harding, J., at June Term, 1931, of MecicleNburg.\nAffirmed.\nThis is an action brought by plaintiff against the defendant (1) for alimony without divorce (2) application for an allowance for subsistence pendente lite. 3 C. S., 1667.\nT. L. Kirkpatrick and H. L. Taylor for plaintiff.\nE. A. Ililker and B. G. Watkins for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0840-01",
  "first_page_order": 914,
  "last_page_order": 914
}