{
  "id": 8629082,
  "name": "STATE v. VAN SHOEMAKER, BEN BREWER and WILL McLAIN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Shoemaker",
  "decision_date": "1931-12-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "844",
  "last_page": "844",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 N.C. 844"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 83,
    "char_count": 842,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.435,
    "sha256": "2ab897518a68ad1768c097aa3b15fab14f7979e21a8f3765ffef0b4eb4eabe16",
    "simhash": "1:bf15b89a2924765f",
    "word_count": 140
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:25:15.863450+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. VAN SHOEMAKER, BEN BREWER and WILL McLAIN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pek Cukiam.\nDefendants\u2019 assignments of error on this appeal cannot be sustained. There was evidence tending to show that defendants are guilty as the State contended, at the trial. This evidence was submitted to the jury under a charge which is free from error. The judgment is affirmed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pek Cukiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummibt and Assistant Attorney-General Seawell for the State.",
      "P. P. Dulin and. Lewis & Lewis for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. VAN SHOEMAKER, BEN BREWER and WILL McLAIN.\n(Filed 23 December, 1931.)\nAppeal by defendants from Moore, J., at May Term, 1931, of Ike-dell.\nNo error.\nDefendants were tried on an indictment for violations of the prohibition law of this State. N. 0. Code of 1931, see. 3411. There was a verdict of guilty as to each of the defendants.\nErom judgment on the verdict, the defendants appealed to the Supreme Court.\nAttorney-General Brummibt and Assistant Attorney-General Seawell for the State.\nP. P. Dulin and. Lewis & Lewis for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0844-02",
  "first_page_order": 918,
  "last_page_order": 918
}