{
  "id": 8629536,
  "name": "BESSIE DAVIS, Administratrix of J. H. DAVIS, v. D. C. DAVIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Davis v. Davis",
  "decision_date": "1932-02-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "834",
  "last_page": "835",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 N.C. 834"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 80,
    "char_count": 897,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "sha256": "e74a39a3c9b706e5364d45cce25e67de3597e43ef6296844dac4fd903fa7fd17",
    "simhash": "1:233f11c9660cc79d",
    "word_count": 150
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.445618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BESSIE DAVIS, Administratrix of J. H. DAVIS, v. D. C. DAVIS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee, Cueiam.\nThere was no evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that the defendant is liable for the death of plaintiff\u2019s intestate, as alleged in the complaint. For this reason, there is no error in the judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit. O. S., 567. The judgment is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee, Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. A. McDonald, F. H. Taylor and Hoyle & Hoyle for plaintiff.",
      "Oates & Herring for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BESSIE DAVIS, Administratrix of J. H. DAVIS, v. D. C. DAVIS.\n(Filed 24 February, 1932.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Moore, Special Judge, at September Term, 1931, of HabNEtt.\nAffirmed.\nThis is an action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff\u2019s intestate.\nAt the close of the evidence for the plaintiff, the defendant moved for judgment as of nonsuit. The motion was allowed', and plaintiff duly excepted.\nFrom judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit, plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.\nA. A. McDonald, F. H. Taylor and Hoyle & Hoyle for plaintiff.\nOates & Herring for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0834-02",
  "first_page_order": 900,
  "last_page_order": 901
}