{
  "id": 8629569,
  "name": "SANKY LOVEGROVE v. R. C. JOSEY, Sr.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lovegrove v. Josey",
  "decision_date": "1932-03-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "835",
  "last_page": "836",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 N.C. 835"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "86 S. E., 165",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "171 N. C., 10",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11268657
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/171/0010-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1041,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.43,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20732019511562258
    },
    "sha256": "37cbaf8be9fcdd569730f94e3aebf9109cb6e3f2e58904f816ce64fe86ddf9ad",
    "simhash": "1:90c3a1bd7c18f68b",
    "word_count": 181
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.445618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "SANKY LOVEGROVE v. R. C. JOSEY, Sr."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee, Cukiam.\nTbe principle for which the plaintiff contends is clearly stated in Doyle v. Bush, 171 N. C., 10; 86 S. E., 165. But the evidence in the instant case is not sufficient to bring it within the doctrine therein announced. The defendant was to sell, at his discretion, and settle with the plaintiff, on the basis of the market price of cotton, on the day settlement was requested. This had been the practice between the parties for a number of years.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee, Cukiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. L. Travis and Wade H. Dickens for plaintiff.",
      "George C. Green for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "SANKY LOVEGROVE v. R. C. JOSEY, Sr.\n(Filed 2 March, 1932.)\nAppeal by plaintiff. from Moore, Special Judge, at October Term, 1931, of Halifax.\nCivil action to recover proceeds of share of cotton crop which plaintiff and defendant raised together in 1929.\nThe plaintiff recovered judgment for one-half the sum realized from a sale of- the cotton, but he appeals, assigning as error the court\u2019s refusal to submit an issue on his allegation of fraudulent conversion on the part of the defendant.\nE. L. Travis and Wade H. Dickens for plaintiff.\nGeorge C. Green for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0835-02",
  "first_page_order": 901,
  "last_page_order": 902
}