{
  "id": 8629624,
  "name": "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND et al., v. L. C. MOSELEY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Moseley",
  "decision_date": "1932-03-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "836",
  "last_page": "837",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 N.C. 836"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "14 S. E., 778",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "110 N. C., 289",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273201
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/110/0289-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "74 S. E., 465",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "158 N. C., 455",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655729
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/158/0455-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 S. E., 621",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "189 N. C., 256",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8653985
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/189/0256-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "135 S. E., 181",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "192 N. C., 37",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8616080
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/192/0037-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 766,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.449,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2073205812385201
    },
    "sha256": "2938f6c94a0763de1f3f0ceaf3761da7a1f71306c15a0b1212d716534c37e269",
    "simhash": "1:cab24e794a94206b",
    "word_count": 135
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.445618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND et al., v. L. C. MOSELEY et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nAffirmed on authority of Carswell v. Talley, 192 N. C., 37, 135 S. E., 181, Robinson v. Williams, 189 N. C., 256, 126 S. E., 621, Chemical Co. v. Floyd, 158 N. C., 455, 74 S. E., 465, LeDuc v. Brandt, 110 N. C., 289, 14 S. E., 778.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wallace & White and. Whitalcer \u25a0& Allen for plaintiffs.",
      "Rouse & Rouse for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND et al., v. L. C. MOSELEY et al.\n(Filed 9 March, 1932.)\nApPEAL'by defendants from Devin, J., at November Term, 1931, of LeNOIE.\nCivil action (1) to recover on two promissory notes, and (2) to set aside a deed alleged to have been executed by the defendants in fraud of the plaintiff's rights.\nDemurrer interposed on the ground of misjoinder of parties and causes. Overruled; exception; appeal.\nWallace & White and. Whitalcer \u25a0& Allen for plaintiffs.\nRouse & Rouse for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0836-02",
  "first_page_order": 902,
  "last_page_order": 903
}