{
  "id": 8629650,
  "name": "J. W. MOORE v. B. W. BOONE et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Moore v. Boone",
  "decision_date": "1932-03-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "838",
  "last_page": "838",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 N.C. 838"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "152 S. E., 893",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "198 N. C., 638",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8616861
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/198/0638-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "157 S. E., 797",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "200 N. C., 535",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8624339
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/200/0535-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 915,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.491,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20732096736141759
    },
    "sha256": "40ecf8e329807a9f3ccf7a5354055e0fdcd7e4a4efc755cd46f9b530555b73b6",
    "simhash": "1:5235be273b508689",
    "word_count": 161
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.445618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. W. MOORE v. B. W. BOONE et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nA consideration of the record proper, to which we are limited in the absence of a statement of case on appeal, In re Bank, ante, 251; Casualty Co. v. Green, 200 N. C., 535, 157 S. E., 797, does not show that appellant has overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893. To prevail on appeal, he who alleges error must successfully handle the laboring oar. Mangum v. Winstead, ante, 252; Frazier v. R. R., ante, 11.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. L. Davenport and Battle & Winslow for plaintiff.",
      "Manning & Manning for defendant Brown."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. W. MOORE v. B. W. BOONE et al.\n(Filed 9 March, 1932.)\nAppeal by defendant, T. H. Brown, from Moore, Special Judge, at December Term, 1931, of Nash.\nCivil action to prevent waste, etc.\nFrom a judgment for the plaintiff rendered on the \u201cpleadings and the evidence introduced and admitted by the defendants,\u201d the defendant, T. H. Brown, appeals.\nL. L. Davenport and Battle & Winslow for plaintiff.\nManning & Manning for defendant Brown."
  },
  "file_name": "0838-01",
  "first_page_order": 904,
  "last_page_order": 904
}