{
  "id": 8629721,
  "name": "MARY DAIL DIXON and Her Husband, J. W. DIXON, v. SEABOARD CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK, N. M. OSBORNE and B. W. NEWCOMB",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dixon v. Seaboard Citizens National Bank",
  "decision_date": "1932-03-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "840",
  "last_page": "841",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 N.C. 840"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1207,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.431,
    "sha256": "611806cc436d93a55f1815a35db15c12727fc9a46969710bf0514890c6291294",
    "simhash": "1:dda2e3a5f136f789",
    "word_count": 205
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.445618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MARY DAIL DIXON and Her Husband, J. W. DIXON, v. SEABOARD CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK, N. M. OSBORNE and B. W. NEWCOMB."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CueiaM.\nThere is no error in the judgment confirming the sale of the lands described in the complaint. The exceptions of the plaintiffs were considered and overruled. The court found that the sale was fairly conducted in all respects and that the amount hid is -a fair price for the lands. The sale was confirmed by the court in its discretion. The only assignment of error is based upon an exception to the judgment. It cannot be sustained. The judgment is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gulley & Gulley and D. B. Jackson for plaintiffs.",
      "Joseph B. Cheshire, Jr., for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MARY DAIL DIXON and Her Husband, J. W. DIXON, v. SEABOARD CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK, N. M. OSBORNE and B. W. NEWCOMB.\n(Filed 23 March, 1932.)\nAppeal by plaintiffs from Small, J., at November Term, 1931, of Wake.\nAffirmed.\nThis action was heard on the motion of the defendants that the sale of the lands described in the complaint, made by the commissioners appointed for that purpose, pursuant to a judgment, by consent, at February Term, 1930, of the Superior Court of Wake County, be confirmed.\nFrom judgment confirming tbe sale and directing the commissioners to convey the lands to the purchasers, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.\nGulley & Gulley and D. B. Jackson for plaintiffs.\nJoseph B. Cheshire, Jr., for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0840-02",
  "first_page_order": 906,
  "last_page_order": 907
}