{
  "id": 8629863,
  "name": "J. HERBERT BECK v. W. S. HALLIWELL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Beck v. Halliwell",
  "decision_date": "1932-04-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "846",
  "last_page": "847",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 N.C. 846"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "69 S. E., 79",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "153 N. C., 188",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11271911
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/153/0188-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1194,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.443,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20732482859039272
    },
    "sha256": "7b644547b902e359f236da91d60ed4ca379ff28239e9aaa265d8b454e98f97d8",
    "simhash": "1:cc6feccdf8eb8e5b",
    "word_count": 203
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.445618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. HERBERT BECK v. W. S. HALLIWELL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": ". Pee Cubiam.\nThere was evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that defendant is liable to the plaintiff as an original promisor for the purchase price of the goods delivered by plaintiff to the corporation in which defendant was a stockholder. \u201cIt is too well settled to require the citation of sustaining authorities that the statute of frauds does not apply to the original promises or undertakings, though the benefit accrues to another than the promisor.\u201d Hospital Association v. Hobbs, 153 N. C., 188, 69 S. E., 79.\nDefendant\u2019s motion for judgment as of nonsuit was properly denied. The judgment is affirmed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": ". Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. Duncan Matthews for plaintiff.",
      "J. Vance Bowe for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. HERBERT BECK v. W. S. HALLIWELL.\n(Filed 27 April, 1932.)\nFrauds, Statute of A a \u2014 Statute does not apply to original promise to answer for debt of anotlier.\nThe statute of frauds does not apply to the original promise to pay the debts of another.\nAppeal by defendant from Finley, J., at- December Term, 1931, of Moose.\nNo error.\nFrom judgment on the verdict that plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $247.49, with interest and costs, the. defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.\nW. Duncan Matthews for plaintiff.\nJ. Vance Bowe for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0846-02",
  "first_page_order": 912,
  "last_page_order": 913
}