{
  "id": 8629883,
  "name": "WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL v. GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks, and ROBERT STRANGE, Liquidating Agent of the HOME SAVINGS BANK",
  "name_abbreviation": "Campbell v. Hood",
  "decision_date": "1932-04-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "847",
  "last_page": "847",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 N.C. 847"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "161 S. E., 223",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "201 N. C., 840",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628931,
        8628910
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/201/0840-02",
        "/nc/201/0840-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 96,
    "char_count": 971,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.442,
    "sha256": "c659ba02e2ebe23c9b338e6f50b6bb987c6d80d0d0f246ada3ece1887005533a",
    "simhash": "1:da7b835e34140f2f",
    "word_count": 161
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.445618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL v. GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks, and ROBERT STRANGE, Liquidating Agent of the HOME SAVINGS BANK."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "\u2022Peb Cubiam.\nStacy, C. J., not sitting at the hearing of this appeal, and the Associate Justices being evenly divided in opinion as to whether there is error in the judgment, the judgment is affirmed. The decision does not become a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "\u2022Peb Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bryan & Campbell for petitioner,",
      "Woodus Kellum for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL v. GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks, and ROBERT STRANGE, Liquidating Agent of the HOME SAVINGS BANK.\n(Filed 27 April, 1932.)\nAppeal and Error J d \u2014 Wliere Court is evenly divided judgment will be affirmed.\nWhere on appeal the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.\nAppeal by petitioner from Barnhill, J., at October Term, 1931, of New HaNoveb.\nAffirmed.\nFrom judgment that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief prayed for in his petition, the petitioner appealed to the Supreme Court.\nBryan & Campbell for petitioner,\nWoodus Kellum for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0847-01",
  "first_page_order": 913,
  "last_page_order": 913
}