{
  "id": 8629946,
  "name": "JOHN D. DORTON v. LIGGETT AND MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dorton v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.",
  "decision_date": "1932-05-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "849",
  "last_page": "849",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 N.C. 849"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "154 S. E., 662",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "199 N. C., 345",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8600572
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/199/0345-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "159 S. E., 17",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "201 N. C., 139",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8623042
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/201/0139-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 87,
    "char_count": 700,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.452,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20732695226632905
    },
    "sha256": "12cf32edf3ae73ab3ce750d081bf345955014da87b30b7deed54ba961dbad356",
    "simhash": "1:48f702fbd3b58739",
    "word_count": 119
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.445618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOHN D. DORTON v. LIGGETT AND MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nA majority of the Court being of opinion that the case is controlled by the decisions in Meece v. Credit Co., 201 N. C., 139, 159 S. E., 17, and Sutherland v. McLean, 199 N. C., 345, 154 S. E., 662, the judgment stands\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Armfield, Sherrin & Bamhardt for plaintiff.",
      "Walter D. Brown and Fuller, Beade & Fuller for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOHN D. DORTON v. LIGGETT AND MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY.\n(Filed 11 May, 1932.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Schenck, J., at January Term, 1932, of CabaeRus.\nMotion to set aside judgment by default and inquiry, rendered by tbe clerk 20 April, 1931, wbicb inquiry was executed at the August Term, 1931, Cabarrus Superior Court. Motion allowed, and plaintiff appeals.\nArmfield, Sherrin & Bamhardt for plaintiff.\nWalter D. Brown and Fuller, Beade & Fuller for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0849-01",
  "first_page_order": 915,
  "last_page_order": 915
}