{
  "id": 8630005,
  "name": "JOHN W. GARRISON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Garrison v. Southern Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1932-05-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "851",
  "last_page": "852",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 N.C. 851"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "81 S. E., 348",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "157 S. E., 136",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "case_ids": [
        2028745
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/sc/159/0405-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "200 N. C., 803",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626604
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/200/0803-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "201 N. C., 840",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628931,
        8628910
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/201/0840-02",
        "/nc/201/0840-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 932,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.498,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20732868981936783
    },
    "sha256": "686372447c47856dbe3ddf75aaa281500f0329d49f343513da6c9ae6d485c437",
    "simhash": "1:9123b79ff61f4745",
    "word_count": 155
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.445618+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOHN W. GARRISON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per, Cubiam.\nTbe Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., taking no part in tbe consideration or decision of tbe ease, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court stands affirmed in accordance witb tbe general practice of appellate courts, without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840; Durham, v. Lloyd, 200 N. C., 803, 157 S. E., 136.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per, Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Avery & Biddle and Mull & Patton for plaintiff.",
      "Ervin & Ervin for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOHN W. GARRISON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 18 May, 1932.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Moore, J., at October Term, -1931, of Burice.\nCivil action to recover damages for alleged breach of contract in removing spur track running .from defendant\u2019s main line to plaintiff\u2019s premises in the town of Morganton, brought under authority of Parrott v. R. R., 165 N. O., 295, 81 S. E., 348.\nFrom a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence, he appeals, assigning errors.\nAvery & Biddle and Mull & Patton for plaintiff.\nErvin & Ervin for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0851-02",
  "first_page_order": 917,
  "last_page_order": 918
}