{
  "id": 8601527,
  "name": "R. A. HAMILTON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hamilton v. Southern Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1932-06-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "140",
  "last_page": "141",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 N.C. 140"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 52,
    "char_count": 487,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.492,
    "sha256": "54ec5c08dcfb86fd11d864f4079798bafa86748c33f27ce735f71aec8f4187b8",
    "simhash": "1:4885ec389a46c1f2",
    "word_count": 84
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:40.426370+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "R. A. HAMILTON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ClarksoNn, J.\nFor tbe reasons given in the opinion in Hamilton v. R. R., ante, 136, the judgment of the court below is\nEeversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "ClarksoNn, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      ".Clyde A. Douglass and R. N. Simms for plaintiff.",
      "Murray Allen for Seaboard Air Line Railway Company."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "R. A. HAMILTON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 29 June, 1932.)\n(For digest see Hamilton v. R. R., ante, 136.)\nAppeal by defendant, Seaboard Air Line Railway Company from Small; J., at December Term, 1931, of Wake.\n.Clyde A. Douglass and R. N. Simms for plaintiff.\nMurray Allen for Seaboard Air Line Railway Company."
  },
  "file_name": "0140-02",
  "first_page_order": 208,
  "last_page_order": 209
}