{
  "id": 8617184,
  "name": "STATE ex Rel. BEATRICE PARKS, v. A. G. SEAGRAVES",
  "name_abbreviation": "State ex rel. Parks v. Seagraves",
  "decision_date": "1932-12-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "647",
  "last_page": "647",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 N.C. 647"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "47 S. E., 750",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "134 N. C., 735",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11274055
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/134/0735-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "16 S. E., 409",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "111 N. C., 722",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652274
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/111/0722-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "156 S. E., 126",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "199 N. C., 788",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8615941
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/199/0788-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "162 S. E., 896",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "202 N. C., 838",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629650,
        8629668
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/202/0838-01",
        "/nc/202/0838-02"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 1685,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.485,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2227895658799665e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5985285242498694
    },
    "sha256": "daf833454bddab310c22517ad6b7994e3c0f31373dbae2dfaa15e97ee92bf531",
    "simhash": "1:11c6a77aa17539dc",
    "word_count": 307
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:40.426370+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE ex Rel. BEATRICE PARKS, v. A. G. SEAGRAVES."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, C. J.\nThe record recites \u201cjudgment signed,\u201d but we are not advised as to its contents. The proceeding was denominated a criminal action in the justice\u2019s court, and a civil action in the Superior Court. In the absence of the judgment, we cannot know whether it purports to be one rendered in a civil action or in a criminal prosecution.\nRule 19, sec. 1, provides that \u201cthe pleadings on which the case is tried, the issues, and the judgment appealed from shall be a part of the transcript in all cases.\u201d The judgment of the Superior Court is not in the record. Everett v. Fair Association, 202 N. C., 838, 162 S. E., 896. It is the uniform practice to dismiss the appeal for failure to send up necessary parts of the record proper. Riggan v. Harrison, ante, 191; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126. It is the duty of appellant to see that the record is properly made up and transmitted. S. v. Frizell, 111 N. C., 722, 16 S. E., 409.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. J. McDuffie and Trivette & Holshouser for plaintiff.",
      "J. H. Whicker for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE ex Rel. BEATRICE PARKS, v. A. G. SEAGRAVES.\n(Filed 7 December, 1932.)\nAppeal and Error E a \u2014 Judgment is necessary part of record proper.\nIt is tbe duty of the appellant to see that the record is properly made up and transmitted, and it is required that the pleadings, the issues and the judgment be a part of the transcript in all cases, and where the record does not contain these necessary parts the appeal will be dismissed.\nAppeal by defendant from Moore, J., at May Term, 1932, of Wilkies.\nProceeding in bastardy (civil action, S. v. Liles, 134 N. C., 735, 47 S. E., 750).\nFrom \u201cjudgment signed,\u201d the defendant appeals.\nF. J. McDuffie and Trivette & Holshouser for plaintiff.\nJ. H. Whicker for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0647-01",
  "first_page_order": 715,
  "last_page_order": 715
}