{
  "id": 8621378,
  "name": "ESTELLA SILER, Administratrix of ELMINA SILER, v. JEFFERSON MOTORS, Incorporated",
  "name_abbreviation": "Siler v. Jefferson Motors, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1932-06-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "841",
  "last_page": "841",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 N.C. 841"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "202 N. C., 807",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629025
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/202/0807-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "145 S. E., 679",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "196 N. C., 348",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626796
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/196/0348-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 137,
    "char_count": 1354,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.489,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20721208070431907
    },
    "sha256": "89873d5fb563a6369a75f0f6a622fb87b0acbd892323bb660854bc93f38a4369",
    "simhash": "1:219367ba17e703fa",
    "word_count": 237
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:40.426370+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ESTELLA SILER, Administratrix of ELMINA SILER, v. JEFFERSON MOTORS, Incorporated."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis ease is governed and determined by the principles of law heretofore announced by this Court in Holton v. Indemnity Co., 196 N. C., 348, 145 S. E., 679, and Harts v. Chevrolet Co., 202 N. C., 807.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frazier & Frazier for plaintiff.",
      "Sapp & Sapp for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ESTELLA SILER, Administratrix of ELMINA SILER, v. JEFFERSON MOTORS, Incorporated.\n(Filed 29 June, 1932.)\nCivil actiom, before Harwood, Special Judge, at November Term, 1931, of Guilfoed.\nThe defendant is engaged in the business of selling automobiles. On 1 March, 1930, a colored man named John Britton, came to the place of business of defendant and requested the use of a Hudson coupe belonging to defendant. \"Witness for plaintiff said: \u201cHe took it out to drive it just out on the road and back . . . to see how it would drive. He was going to see how it would drive to buy it. He had already made up his mind to buy it.\u201d . . .\nIn driving the car west on the Friendly road the said Britton negligently struck and killed plaintiff\u2019s intestate. All the evidence tended to show that the car was in good condition and there is no evidence to show that Britton was a careless or reckless driver. No agent of defendant was present in the car at the time of the injury.\nAt the conclusion of evidence for plaintiff judgment of nonsuit was entered, and the plaintiff appealed.\nFrazier & Frazier for plaintiff.\nSapp & Sapp for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0841-01",
  "first_page_order": 909,
  "last_page_order": 909
}