{
  "id": 8621768,
  "name": "D. J. EVERETT v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Everett v. North Carolina State Fair Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1932-10-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "849",
  "last_page": "850",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 N.C. 849"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "202 N. C., 838",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629650,
        8629668
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/202/0838-01",
        "/nc/202/0838-02"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 854,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.465,
    "sha256": "b46b16d770d82d15871e046a097d8e42c32e335152b7ed7362be162cefc504aa",
    "simhash": "1:410301f830f22c7b",
    "word_count": 132
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:40.426370+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "D. J. EVERETT v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appeal was dismissed at the Spring Term, 202 N. C., 838, but reinstated on motion of plaintiff.\nWe find no error upon the merits of the appeal, hence the judgment will be upheld.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Nimocles & Nimocks for pilaintiff.",
      "Attorney-General Brumm\u00fct and Assistant Attorney-General Siler for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "D. J. EVERETT v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION.\n(Filed 26 October, 1932.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Devin, J., at February Term, 1932, of Wake.\nProceeding under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act to determine liability of defendant, as self-insurer, to plaintiff for injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.\nThere was an award which was subsequently reduced, and from this subsequent ruling, the plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court, where the judgment of the Commission was affirmed. Plaintiff appeals.\nNimocles & Nimocks for pilaintiff.\nAttorney-General Brumm\u00fct and Assistant Attorney-General Siler for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0849-02",
  "first_page_order": 917,
  "last_page_order": 918
}