{
  "id": 8621830,
  "name": "W. E. THOMPSON v. GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks",
  "name_abbreviation": "Thompson v. Hood",
  "decision_date": "1932-11-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "851",
  "last_page": "851",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 N.C. 851"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "138 S. E., 349",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "194 N. C., 44",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8596782
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/194/0044-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1435,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20721652111764044
    },
    "sha256": "5bb0fe3d4fd7a3899a75f0d318c6c5bc6a03102fba1adacbf8d732d41393e168",
    "simhash": "1:a87a491e00409f45",
    "word_count": 249
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:40.426370+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. E. THOMPSON v. GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThere was sufficient evidence at tbe trial of tbis action to support tbe findings of fact made by tbe referee, and approved by tbe judge. These findings of fact are, therefore, conclusive.\n\u201cIt is settled by all tbe decisions on tbe subject, with none to tbe contrary, that tbe findings of fact, made by a referee, and approved by tbe trial judge, are not subject to review on appeal, if they are supported by any competent evidence.\u201d Kenney v. Hotel Co., 194 N. C., 44, 138 S. E., 349.\nTbe judgment upon tbe facts set out in tbe report of tbe referee, is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "8. M. Gattis, Jr., for plaintiff.",
      "Graham & Sawyer for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. E. THOMPSON v. GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks.\n(Filed 2 November, 1932.)\nAppeal and Error J c \u2014 findings of fact are conclusive when supported by evidence.\nTbe findings of fact by tbe referee, approved by tbe trial court, and supported by the evidence are conclusive on appeal.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Barnhill, J., at August Term, 1932, of Obange.\nAffirmed.\nTbis is an action to recover judgment for tbe amount due plaintiff by tbe Bank of Efland, wbicb is now insolvent and in tbe bands of defendant for liquidation. Tbe action was beard upon plaintiff\u2019s exceptions to tbe report of tbe referee. These exceptions were not sustained. Tbe report was confirmed in all respects.\nFrom judgment in accordance with tbe report of tbe referee, tbe plaintiff appealed to tbe Supreme Court.\n8. M. Gattis, Jr., for plaintiff.\nGraham & Sawyer for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0851-01",
  "first_page_order": 919,
  "last_page_order": 919
}