{
  "id": 8621876,
  "name": "IN THE MATTER OF H. C. SCALES, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Scales",
  "decision_date": "1932-11-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "851",
  "last_page": "852",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 N.C. 851"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 580,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.438,
    "sha256": "b8a4a817d6831e8840991ec32bc81261ec533705e4f47a289cd5458e6cc4c115",
    "simhash": "1:3a0ac12f2aa63434",
    "word_count": 93
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:40.426370+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN THE MATTER OF H. C. SCALES, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nIn the Forsyth County Court it was adjudged that the respondent be attached for contempt growing out of his disobedience of a restraining order. In the Superior Court the appeal was dismissed and the respondent was committed to the custody of the sheriff. The judgment is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Joe W. Johnson and S. E. Hall for respondent.",
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Seawell for the State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN THE MATTER OF H. C. SCALES, Respondent.\n(Filed 9 November, 1932.)\nAppeal by respondent from Shaw, Emergency Judge, at June Term, 1932, of Fobsyth.\nAffirmed.\nJoe W. Johnson and S. E. Hall for respondent.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Seawell for the State."
  },
  "file_name": "0851-02",
  "first_page_order": 919,
  "last_page_order": 920
}