{
  "id": 8621913,
  "name": "NATIONAL DRUG COMPANY v. J. B. McCREARY, Sheriff, and CASEY MYERS, Deputy Sheriff and A. R. MYERS, Surety",
  "name_abbreviation": "National Drug Co. v. McCreary",
  "decision_date": "1932-11-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "852",
  "last_page": "852",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 N.C. 852"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 768,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "sha256": "4c18bd03acd30b4334b37462189fe8ce36baacf7c3c6bed858027bfdcae7421b",
    "simhash": "1:578fa076c5646ff4",
    "word_count": 127
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:40.426370+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "NATIONAL DRUG COMPANY v. J. B. McCREARY, Sheriff, and CASEY MYERS, Deputy Sheriff and A. R. MYERS, Surety."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nWe find no error that would entitle the defendants to a nonsuit or a new trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Manly, Hmdren & Womble for plaintiff.",
      "Hllege & Wells and Fred S. Hutchins for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NATIONAL DRUG COMPANY v. J. B. McCREARY, Sheriff, and CASEY MYERS, Deputy Sheriff and A. R. MYERS, Surety.\n(Filed 9 November, 1932.)\nAppeal by defendants from Harding, J., at February Term, 1932, of Forsyth.\nNo error.\nJudgment was rendered upon the following verdict and the defendants appealed:\nWas the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendants in failing to serve the execution upon the Eureka Drug Company and levy upon the property of the Eureka Drug Company as alleged? Answer: Yes.\nWhat damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $263.72.\nManly, Hmdren & Womble for plaintiff.\nHllege & Wells and Fred S. Hutchins for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0852-01",
  "first_page_order": 920,
  "last_page_order": 920
}