{
  "id": 8622337,
  "name": "STATE v. C. G. CALL",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Call",
  "decision_date": "1932-12-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "860",
  "last_page": "860",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 N.C. 860"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 56,
    "char_count": 469,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.447,
    "sha256": "e8f66f1f54bdbaa51ff648eab048577d13704eaba1c3f9151fd7289cf195657e",
    "simhash": "1:5402d4d94b34a54d",
    "word_count": 78
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:40.426370+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. C. G. CALL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe defendant was indicted in six counts for a violation of the liquor law. The jury returned this verdict: \u201cWe find the defendant guilty.\u201d We have considered the exceptions and have found no error in the trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Seawell for the Stale.",
      "B. 0. Brock for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. C. G. CALL.\n(Filed 14 December, 1932.)\nAppeal by defendant from McElroy, J., at August Term, 1932, of Davie.\nNo error.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Seawell for the Stale.\nB. 0. Brock for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0860-01",
  "first_page_order": 928,
  "last_page_order": 928
}