{
  "id": 8618744,
  "name": "EASTERN COTTON OIL COMPANY v. NEW BERN OIL AND FERTILIZER COMPANY, JOHN S. WESKITT, W. J. SWAN and H. G. SWAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eastern Cotton Oil Co. v. New Bern Oil & Fertilizer Co.",
  "decision_date": "1933-03-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "363",
  "last_page": "363",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 N.C. 363"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 840,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.49,
    "sha256": "7d796ac52169b32790ffde7e04a42af13df09fb9a26734274b5b76bf6a2e7a00",
    "simhash": "1:3883e00e9f6b2607",
    "word_count": 141
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:28.108315+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "EASTERN COTTON OIL COMPANY v. NEW BERN OIL AND FERTILIZER COMPANY, JOHN S. WESKITT, W. J. SWAN and H. G. SWAN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Connor, J.\nThe questions presented by this appeal are identical with the questions presented by the appeal docketed in this Court as No. 17.\nThe judgment is affirmed on the authority of the decision in that appeal. See opinion in Oil Co. v. Fertilizer Co., ante, 362.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Connor, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Tazewell Taylor and McMullan & McMullan for plaintiff.",
      "L. I. Moore for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "EASTERN COTTON OIL COMPANY v. NEW BERN OIL AND FERTILIZER COMPANY, JOHN S. WESKITT, W. J. SWAN and H. G. SWAN.\n(Filed 15 March, 1933.)\n(For digest see Oil Co. v. Fertilizer Co., ante, 362.)\nAppeal by defendants from Parker, J., at December Term, 1932, of PeequimaNS.\nAffirmed.\nProm judgment overruling their plea in abatement, and denying their motion for the removal of the action to the Superior Court of Craven County, for trial, the defendants appealed to the Supreme Court.\nTazewell Taylor and McMullan & McMullan for plaintiff.\nL. I. Moore for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0363-01",
  "first_page_order": 429,
  "last_page_order": 429
}