{
  "id": 8622629,
  "name": "FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PENDER COUNTY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Board of Education",
  "decision_date": "1933-05-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "607",
  "last_page": "608",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 N.C. 607"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "162 S. E., 763",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "202 N. C., 354",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626312
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/202/0354-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 95,
    "char_count": 1021,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.434,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20722269908400065
    },
    "sha256": "c399e4b9090eeb07f219fb916f841c207310894502b2e5d6abc6815f342bf257",
    "simhash": "1:f284d86e076190aa",
    "word_count": 174
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:28.108315+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PENDER COUNTY et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BhogueN, J.\nThe cause was considered in Fidelity Co. v. Board of Education, 202 N. C., 354, 162 S. E., 763. The petition to rehear as-sei'ts that the writer of the opinion made an error of calculation in assuming that the amount of retained percentage in controversy was $4,375.20, whereas in fact the retained percentage based upon the contract price, would amount to $7,442.70. A reexamination of the record discloses that the contention of the plaintiff is correct and that such error was made. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover the sum of $4,375.20, and it is so adjudged.\nPetition allowed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BhogueN, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "I. C. Wright for plaintiff.",
      "C. E. McCullen and Bryan & Campbell for Board of Education."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PENDER COUNTY et al.\n(Filed 3 May, 1933.)\nAppeal and Error K c\u2014\nWhere it appears from the record that the Court made an error in calculating the amount recoverable by plaintiff a petition to rehear will he granted and the error corrected.\nPetition to rehear.\nI. C. Wright for plaintiff.\nC. E. McCullen and Bryan & Campbell for Board of Education."
  },
  "file_name": "0607-01",
  "first_page_order": 673,
  "last_page_order": 674
}