{
  "id": 8625602,
  "name": "EDNA W. BANKS, Executrix, etc., v. NATIONAL ACCIDENT AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Banks v. National Accident & Health Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1933-03-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "782",
  "last_page": "783",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 N.C. 782"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1137,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.495,
    "sha256": "07da419003debb4e633e64fc7739b8e3788cdd69bac701a1ce86562f07aebdfa",
    "simhash": "1:1fa1d3c88c0a1d4a",
    "word_count": 182
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:28.108315+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "EDNA W. BANKS, Executrix, etc., v. NATIONAL ACCIDENT AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nOn controverted issues of fact, the jury has responded in favor of the plaintiff. The case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the apposite decisions on the subject and agreeably to the principles of law applicable. We have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "S. J. Everett for plaintiff.",
      "Prescott, Tyson & Spain for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "EDNA W. BANKS, Executrix, etc., v. NATIONAL ACCIDENT AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY.\n(Filed 22 March, 1933.)\nAppeal by defendant from Frizzelle, J., at September Term, 1932, of Pitt.\nCivil action to recover on contract of insurance.\nTbe execution of tbe policy was admitted. Tbe defense interposed was, tbat in tbe application tbe assured made false answers to material questions concerning bis health and previous medical attention.\nIJpon conflicting evidence, tbe issues raised by the pleadings were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment on the verdict, from which the defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nS. J. Everett for plaintiff.\nPrescott, Tyson & Spain for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0782-01",
  "first_page_order": 848,
  "last_page_order": 849
}